Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
- Up to 31% cheaper than Megaport - €1199.00 vs €1729.00
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 109% better in No Man's Sky than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - 182 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing No Man's Sky than MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 - €9.50 vs €13.78 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
87
48%
Value, €/FPS
€13.78/FPS
69%
Price, €
€1199
100%
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
33rd Variation
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1729
69%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 341 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
33rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.68 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
157.1 GTexel/s
28%
33rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
86%
Multi-Core
8847
59%
33rd Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
