Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Mavark 4K vs Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation PC Comparison

Mavark 4K vs Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Mavark 4K outperforms Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.

Calculator background
This is a free version of Need For Speed Unbound.
Need For Speed Unbound

Need For Speed Unbound

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra


FPS

176

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

My Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

GPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Logo
GeForce RTX 4090

24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit

Pixel Fillrate

443.5 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

1290 GTexel/s

100%


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Logo
GeForce RTX 4090

24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit

Pixel Fillrate

443.5 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

1290 GTexel/s

100%

CPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores

Mavark 4K Gaming PC Image

Mavark 4K Gaming PC

vs
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC Image

Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC

UnknownUnknown
Core i9-13900KCore i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090
16 GB16 GB
8 TB SSDN/A Storage

Popular Mavark 4K Gaming PC and Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC Comparisons

Compare 2 PCs in Games

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.