Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Kiebel outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Performs up to 357% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - 137 vs 30 FPS
- Up to 63% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Memory - €10.72 vs €28.63 per FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 42% cheaper than Kiebel - €859.0 vs €1469.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
11th Variation
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1469
58%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 483 minutes ago
Buy for €859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
11th Variation
372nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
372nd Variation
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
44.54 GPixel/s
28%
Texel Fillrate
66.82 GTexel/s
14%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
100%
Multi-Core
10125
100%
CPU Winner
Kiebel Gaming PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1000 GB SSD |
