Key Differences
In short — Kiebel outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Performs up to 88% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 314 vs 167 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 48% cheaper than Kiebel - €769.0 vs €1469.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing World of Tanks than Kiebel - €4.6 vs €4.68 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 569 minutes ago
Buy for €769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 576 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
11th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
99%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
61%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
100%
Multi-Core
10125
100%
CPU Winner
Kiebel Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-11900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | Radeon RX 6600 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
