Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 35% better in Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - 179 vs 133 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 37% cheaper than Gaming - €1199.00 vs €1899.00
- Up to 15% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Gaming - €9.02 vs €10.61 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243672 minutes ago
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7455 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
3rd Variation
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
76%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-13700KF
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2887
100%
Multi-Core
17606
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
