Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Gaming on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Gaming is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Up to 70% cheaper than Megaport - €799.0 vs €2629.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - €6.95 vs €10.52 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 117% better in Monster Hunter: World than Gaming - 250 vs 115 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75729 minutes ago
26th Variation
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.52/FPS
66.06463878326997%
Price, €
€2629
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,629 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
32nd Variation
26th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
32nd Variation
Radeon RX 7600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
59.48879551820728%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
41.6421568627451%
26th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
70.4954954954955%
Multi-Core
8910
42.34388366124893%
26th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| Radeon RX 7600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
