Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 123 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Megaport - €799.0 vs €919.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €6.5 vs €8.67 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75055 minutes ago
18th Variation
FPS
106
86.1788617886179%
Value, €/FPS
€8.67/FPS
74.97116493656286%
Price, €
€919
86%
Buy for €919 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75067 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
32nd Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
32nd Variation
Radeon RX 7600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
50.20600353148911%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
58.56386109476163%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
91.58186864014802%
CPU Winner
18th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
96.80511182108627%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 7600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
