Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 68% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Megaport - 460 vs 274 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than Gaming - €899.0 vs €1879.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Gaming - €3.28 vs €4.08 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
274
59.56521739130435%
Value, €/FPS
€3.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€899
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
31st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
31st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
50.6215173596228%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
40.500685871056234%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
31st Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2824
100%
Multi-Core
16743
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
71.8484419263456%
Multi-Core
8539
51.00041808516992%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
