Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 202 vs 200 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 5% cheaper than Gaming - €2179.0 vs €2299.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Gaming - €10.89 vs €11.38 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
28th Variation
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.38/FPS
95.69420035149385%
Price, €
€2299
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3253 minutes ago
34th Variation
FPS
200
99.00990099009901%
Value, €/FPS
€10.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2179
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2477 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
28th Variation
34th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
28th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
87.74509803921568%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
84.43627450980392%
34th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
34th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
null-core
Single-Core
2542
86.96544645911735%
Multi-Core
14881
83.37161745756065%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
