Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 148% better in Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - 221 vs 89 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 67% cheaper than Gaming - €769.0 vs €2299.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Gaming - €8.64 vs €10.4 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €2,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 607 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
89
40.27149321266968%
Value, €/FPS
€8.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€769
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 617 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
28th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
28th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
63.607342378292095%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
40.49346879535559%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
28th Variation
Ryzen 9 7900X
4.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2923
100%
Multi-Core
17849
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600G
3.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1918
65.61751625042764%
Multi-Core
7665
42.943582273516725%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600G |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | Radeon RX 6600 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
