Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport High End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport High End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 86% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport High End - 169 vs 91 FPS
Advantages of Megaport High End Gaming PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than Gaming - €1079.0 vs €2249.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Gaming - €11.86 vs €13.31 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €2,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 659 minutes ago
12th Variation
FPS
91
53%
Value, €/FPS
€11.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1079
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,079 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 677 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
23rd Variation
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
23rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
23rd Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
12th Variation
Core i7-11700F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2101
77%
Multi-Core
8790
57%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport High End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i7-11700F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
