Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport High End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport High End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Megaport High End - 236 vs 224 FPS
Advantages of Megaport High End Gaming PC
- Up to 10% cheaper than Gaming - €1329.0 vs €1469.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing World of Tanks than Gaming - €5.93 vs €6.22 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142318 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
224
94.91525423728814%
Value, €/FPS
€5.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1329
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 918 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
16th Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
16th Variation
Radeon RX 7600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
69.51147733961153%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
69.51147733961153%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
16th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
92.90180213313718%
Multi-Core
13549
89.30266279989453%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport High End Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
Radeon RX 7600 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |