Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Titan - outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Titan - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 160 vs 141 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Megaport - €1589.00 vs €1649.00
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €9.93 vs €11.70 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
5th Variation
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1589
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,589 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 477044 minutes ago
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
5th Variation
52nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
52nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
73%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2402
92%
Multi-Core
11831
78%
52nd Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2608
100%
Multi-Core
15118
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Titan - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
