Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Neo - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Neo - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Up to 31% cheaper than Captiva - €1599.0 vs €2309.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Captiva - €8.16 vs €9.66 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 22% better in Sea of Thieves than GameMachines Neo - - 239 vs 196 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
1st Variation
FPS
196
82.00836820083683%
Value, €/FPS
€8.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1599
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75995 minutes ago
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75994 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
1st Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
75.86206896551724%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
72.70114942528735%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
79.39495798319328%
Multi-Core
11527
59.930331704273684%
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
