Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms GameMachines Neo - on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 92% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than GameMachines Neo - - 179 vs 93 FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
FPS
93
52%
Value, €/FPS
€14.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1349
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 403 minutes ago
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 400 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
29%
GPU Winner
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
