Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGIC Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ACEMAGIC Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 74% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than ACEMAGIC Mini - 127 vs 73 FPS
Advantages of ACEMAGIC Mini PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than GameMachines Neo - - €739.0 vs €1349.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than GameMachines Neo - - €10.12 vs €10.62 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
6th Variation
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.62/FPS
95.29190207156309%
Price, €
€1349
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2566 minutes ago
Buy for €739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
78.57747671464861%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
58.93310753598645%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | ACEMAGIC Mini PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | Radeon 780M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
