Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Megaport - 182 vs 179 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 14% cheaper than GameMachines Neo - - €1489.0 vs €1729.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than GameMachines Neo - - €8.32 vs €9.5 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
5th Variation
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.5/FPS
87.57894736842105%
Price, €
€1729
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1965 minutes ago
27th Variation
FPS
179
98.35164835164835%
Value, €/FPS
€8.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1489
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2748 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
5th Variation
27th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
27th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
27th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
null-core
Single-Core
2854
95.9327731092437%
Multi-Core
14808
76.98866590412811%
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700 |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |