Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 85% better in World of Tanks than Megaport - 384 vs 208 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than GameMachines Neo - - €929.0 vs €1929.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing World of Tanks than GameMachines Neo - - €4.47 vs €5.02 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
FPS
384
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.02/FPS
89.04382470119522%
Price, €
€1929
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236990 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
208
54.166666666666664%
Value, €/FPS
€4.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€929
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
59.64646464646465%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
42.60461760461761%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
8th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
71.29411764705881%
Multi-Core
9729
50.58230217323489%
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
