Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Neo - outperforms the more expensive Kiebel on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 23 than Kiebel - 201 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Kiebel - €1459.0 vs €1469.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing F1 23 than Kiebel - €7.26 vs €7.81 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1459
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2601 minutes ago
Buy for €1,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2596 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
51%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
