Key Differences
In short — Formacom outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Neo - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Neo - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Up to 48% cheaper than Formacom - €1459.0 vs €2799.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Formacom - €8.68 vs €10.56 per FPS
Advantages of Formacom PC
- Performs up to 58% better in Sea of Thieves than GameMachines Neo - - 265 vs 168 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
3rd Variation
FPS
168
63%
Value, €/FPS
€8.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1459
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2606 minutes ago
Buy for €2,799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2602 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
3rd Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
28%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
95%
Multi-Core
19234
91%
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Formacom PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
