Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Neo - outperforms STGAubron on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 34% better in Battlefield IV than STGAubron - 219 vs 164 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1249
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1978 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
105.6 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
224.4 GTexel/s
95%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | STGAubron Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
