Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End outperforms the cheaper GameMachines HyperCube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Up to 35% cheaper than ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End - €1099.0 vs €1699.95
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 58% better in No Man's Sky than GameMachines HyperCube - - 188 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing No Man's Sky than GameMachines HyperCube - - €9.04 vs €9.24 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
119
63.297872340425535%
Value, €/FPS
€9.24/FPS
97.83549783549782%
Price, €
€1099
100%
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4491 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699.95
64%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,699.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4490 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
59.64646464646465%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
42.60461760461761%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
76.43243243243244%
Multi-Core
9729
56.13316408954535%
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700F
null-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
