Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End outperforms the cheaper GameMachines HyperCube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Up to 27% cheaper than ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End - €1099.0 vs €1499.95
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 49% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GameMachines HyperCube - - 429 vs 287 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than GameMachines HyperCube - - €3.5 vs €3.83 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
287
66.8997668997669%
Value, €/FPS
€3.83/FPS
91.38381201044386%
Price, €
€1099
100%
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4524 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
429
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499.95
73%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,499.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3743 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74.5580808080808%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
51.86649099692578%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
78.0066200809121%
Multi-Core
9729
59.27979527175238%
1st Variation
Core i7-14700
null-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
16412
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-14700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
