Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines HyperCube - outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 52% better in Dead Space than Megaport - 94 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Dead Space than Megaport - €14.14 vs €15.63 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 27% cheaper than GameMachines HyperCube - - €969.0 vs €1329.0
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1329
72%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2920 minutes ago
18th Variation
FPS
62
65.95744680851064%
Value, €/FPS
€15.63/FPS
90.46705054382598%
Price, €
€969
100%
Buy for €969 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
53.8510101010101%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
43.697848045674135%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
