Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper GameMachines HyperCube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines HyperCube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Up to 52% cheaper than Megaport - €1049.0 vs €2199.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dead Space than Megaport - €15.2 vs €17.88 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 78% better in Dead Space than GameMachines HyperCube - - 123 vs 69 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
69
56.09756097560976%
Value, €/FPS
€15.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1049
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88403 minutes ago
44th Variation
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.88/FPS
85.01118568232661%
Price, €
€2199
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
44th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
47.12689545091779%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
34.28156748911466%
44th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
null-core
Single-Core
2191
80.58109599117323%
Multi-Core
8910
58.72660163459004%
44th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
null-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
