Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper GameMachines HyperCube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines HyperCube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC
- Up to 30% cheaper than Megaport - €1049.00 vs €1499.00
- Up to 7% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Megaport - €5.00 vs €5.39 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 32% better in Battlefield IV than GameMachines HyperCube - - 278 vs 210 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
210
76%
Value, €/FPS
€5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1049
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166117 minutes ago
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 790 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
75%
31st Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
99%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
GameMachines HyperCube - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
