Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Element - RGB outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Element - RGB Gaming PC
- Performs up to 39% better in Starfield than GameMachines Cube - - 39 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Starfield than GameMachines Cube - - €37.67 vs €45.68 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 13% cheaper than GameMachines Element - RGB - €1279.0 vs €1469.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
16th Variation
FPS
39
100%
Value, €/FPS
€37.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1469
87%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Buy for €1,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
16th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
79%
Multi-Core
11527
59%
GameMachines Element - RGB Gaming PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
