Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Cyber - outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - 70 vs 66 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 9% cheaper than GameMachines Cyber - - €1369.0 vs €1499.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than GameMachines Cyber - - €20.74 vs €21.41 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
FPS
70
100%
Value, €/FPS
€21.41/FPS
96%
Price, €
€1499
91%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3133 minutes ago
Buy for €1,369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
68%
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-13700KF
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2887
100%
Multi-Core
17606
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
