Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive GameMachines Cyber - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GameMachines Cyber - - 66 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than GameMachines Cyber - - €1369.0 vs €1399.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than GameMachines Cyber - - €20.74 vs €24.98 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3147 minutes ago
30th Variation
FPS
66
100%
Value, €/FPS
€20.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1369
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,369 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
68%
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
97%
CPU Winner
30th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
92%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
