Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Cyber - outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 105% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - 133 vs 65 FPS
- Up to 24% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - €13.15 vs €17.37 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 35% cheaper than GameMachines Cyber - - €1129.0 vs €1749.0
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1749
64%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3179 minutes ago
Buy for €1,129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
55%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-13700KF
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2887
100%
Multi-Core
17606
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
