Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Cyber - outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 80% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GameMachines Cube - - 173 vs 96 FPS
- Up to 24% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GameMachines Cube - - €10.11 vs €13.32 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 27% cheaper than GameMachines Cyber - - €1279.0 vs €1749.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1749
73%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1769 minutes ago
Buy for €1,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1760 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-13700KF
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2887
100%
Multi-Core
17606
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
81%
Multi-Core
11527
65%
GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-13700KF | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |