Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Cyber - outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Engineer X10 High End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Engineer X10 High End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 49% better in Battlefield IV than ERAZER Engineer X10 High End - 360 vs 242 FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 40% cheaper than GameMachines Cyber - - €1049.99 vs €1749.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Battlefield IV than GameMachines Cyber - - €4.34 vs €4.86 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
360
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.86/FPS
89%
Price, €
€1749
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 762 minutes ago
FPS
242
67%
Value, €/FPS
€4.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1049.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,049.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
55%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-13700KF
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2887
100%
Multi-Core
17606
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC | vs | ERAZER Engineer X10 High End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700KF | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
