Key Differences
In short — GameMachines Cube – outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of GameMachines Cube – Gaming PC
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than EMCA4 - 319 vs 300 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GameMachines Cube – Gaming PC
3rd Variation
EMCA4 Computer PC
41st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GameMachines Cube – Gaming PC
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
78%
GPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC
41st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
GameMachines Cube – Gaming PC
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2988
100%
Multi-Core
19479
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube – Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
