Key Differences
In short — Formacom outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 47% cheaper than Formacom - €1699.0 vs €3199.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Formacom - €22.06 vs €26.44 per FPS
Advantages of Formacom PC
- Performs up to 57% better in Alan Wake 2 than GameMachines Cube - - 121 vs 77 FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
1st Variation
FPS
77
63%
Value, €/FPS
€22.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Buy for €3,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
1st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
55%
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
76%
Multi-Core
11527
54%
2nd Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | Formacom PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
