Key Differences
In short — ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 56% cheaper than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €1579.0 vs €3599.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Valheim than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €11.87 vs €18.18 per FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 49% better in Valheim than GameMachines Cube - - 198 vs 133 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
1st Variation
FPS
133
67.17171717171718%
Value, €/FPS
€11.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1579
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3685 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€18.18/FPS
65.29152915291529%
Price, €
€3599
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
1st Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
55.46218487394958%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
55.80882352941177%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
null-core
Single-Core
2362
79.39495798319328%
Multi-Core
11527
59.930331704273684%
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
