Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 26% cheaper than Captiva - €1699.0 vs €2309.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing League of Legends than Captiva - €5.96 vs €6.04 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 34% better in League of Legends than GameMachines Cube - - 382 vs 285 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
285
74%
Value, €/FPS
€5.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3475 minutes ago
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3474 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
72%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
79%
Multi-Core
11527
59%
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
