Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 38% cheaper than Captiva - €1459.0 vs €2359.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Captiva - €22.11 vs €22.68 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 58% better in Sons Of The Forest than GameMachines Cube - - 104 vs 66 FPS
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
FPS
66
63%
Value, €/FPS
€22.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1459
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Buy for €2,359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
37%
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
84%
Multi-Core
13549
70%
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700KF | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
