Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 66% cheaper than Captiva - €1399.0 vs €4089.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dota 2 than Captiva - €6.6 vs €14.76 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 31% better in Dota 2 than GameMachines Cube - - 277 vs 212 FPS
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
3rd Variation
FPS
212
76.53429602888086%
Value, €/FPS
€6.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1724 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
277
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.76/FPS
44.71544715447154%
Price, €
€4089
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
3rd Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26.62908680947012%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18.310077519379846%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
95.72072072072072%
Multi-Core
19234
91.40766086873872%
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
