Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than GameMachines Cube - - 31 vs 28 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than GameMachines Cube - - €999.0 vs €1279.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Starfield than GameMachines Cube - - €32.23 vs €45.68 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1606 minutes ago
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1603 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
24th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
93%
Multi-Core
11527
85%
24th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1000 GB SSD |
