Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FANAT outperforms the cheaper GEEKOM A8 Mini on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of FANAT Gaming PC
- Performs up to 57% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GEEKOM A8 Mini - 74 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GEEKOM A8 Mini - €10.66 vs €15.35 per FPS
Advantages of GEEKOM A8 Mini PC
- Up to 9% cheaper than FANAT - €721.65 vs €789.00
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 331 minutes ago
Buy for €721.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 334 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
6th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
92%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
2nd Variation
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
70%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 8845HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2486
100%
Multi-Core
11671
100%
CPU Winner
FANAT Gaming PC | vs | GEEKOM A8 Mini PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | Radeon 780M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1000 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
