Key Differences
In short — ERAZER Mechanic Epic High-End outperforms the cheaper SYSTEMTREFF High-End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing SYSTEMTREFF High-End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ERAZER Mechanic Epic High-End Gaming PC
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than SYSTEMTREFF High-End - 218 vs 214 FPS
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than ERAZER Mechanic Epic High-End - €3849.90 vs €4999.00
- Up to 22% better value when playing No Man's Sky than ERAZER Mechanic Epic High-End - €17.99 vs €22.93 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€22.93/FPS
78%
Price, €
€4999
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
43rd Variation
FPS
214
98%
Value, €/FPS
€17.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3849.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €3,849.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
43rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
43rd Variation
Core i9-13900KF
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2973
96%
Multi-Core
20101
96%
ERAZER Mechanic Epic High-End Gaming PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF High-End Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i9-13900KF |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
24 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
4 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |