Key Differences
In short — ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 119% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Megaport - 149 vs 68 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 56% cheaper than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €959.00 vs €2184.94
- Up to 4% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €14.10 vs €14.66 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
5th Variation
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.66/FPS
96%
Price, €
€2184.94
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,184.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1098 minutes ago
Buy for €959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 558 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
5th Variation
18th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
34%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
29%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
