Key Differences
In short — Captiva Ultimate outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 23% cheaper than Captiva Ultimate - €3599.0 vs €4691.72
- Up to 21% better value when playing Valorant than Captiva Ultimate - €3.79 vs €4.8 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva Ultimate Gaming PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Valorant than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - 978 vs 950 FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
FPS
950
97.13701431492842%
Value, €/FPS
€3.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3599
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €3,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359 minutes ago
FPS
978
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.8/FPS
78.95833333333334%
Price, €
€4691.72
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,691.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 683 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
64.3968432919955%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
63.25581395348837%
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
97.96770743136555%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Captiva Ultimate Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
