Key Differences
In short — ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cyber - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cyber - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Starfield than GameMachines Cyber - - 64 vs 62 FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC
- Up to 10% cheaper than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €1979.0 vs €2199.95
- Up to 7% better value when playing Starfield than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €31.92 vs €34.37 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
64
100%
Value, €/FPS
€34.37/FPS
92.87169042769858%
Price, €
€2199.95
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,199.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 645 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
62
96.875%
Value, €/FPS
€31.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1979
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227861 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
79.01037509976058%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
80.4644412191582%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
93.27731092436974%
Multi-Core
17332
90.11126130810024%
7th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | GameMachines Cyber - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700F | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
