Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Up to 58% cheaper than Captiva - €1699.95 vs €4089.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Captiva - €7.49 vs €15.43 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield 1 than ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End - 265 vs 227 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
227
85.66037735849056%
Value, €/FPS
€7.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,699.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2418 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
265
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.43/FPS
48.54180168502917%
Price, €
€4089
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2418 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
44.64487034949267%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
42.97674418604651%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700F
null-core
Single-Core
2775
89.28571428571429%
Multi-Core
17332
82.36859614105123%
ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700F | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
