Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms ERAZER on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 74% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than ERAZER - 113 vs 65 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 25th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
51st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 25th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
25%
51st Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 25th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
82%
Multi-Core
8910
60%
51st Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i5-13600K |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
