Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - 426 vs 417 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
33rd Variation
FPS
426
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1729
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8573 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
20th Variation
33rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62%
GPU Winner
33rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
20th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600X
4.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2863
100%
Multi-Core
12807
86%
CPU Winner
33rd Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
89%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600X | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
