Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms Dell XPS 8950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Dell XPS 8950 - 346 vs 319 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
346
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
96%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
90%
Multi-Core
15445
79%
Dell XPS 8950 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB SSD + 12 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |