Key Differences
In short — Cooler Master Cooling X outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Cooler Master Cooling X PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than Megaport - 841 vs 823 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 43% cheaper than Cooler Master Cooling X - €2179.0 vs €3825.69
- Up to 42% better value when playing Minecraft than Cooler Master Cooling X - €2.65 vs €4.55 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FPS
841
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.55/FPS
58.24175824175825%
Price, €
€3825.69
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,825.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366 minutes ago
34th Variation
FPS
823
97.85969084423306%
Value, €/FPS
€2.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2179
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 373 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
34th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
98.24929971988794%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
93.32107843137256%
34th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
34th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
87.11446196024674%
Multi-Core
14881
75.79585391942139%
Cooler Master Cooling X PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |