Key Differences
In short — Cooler Master Cooling X outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Cooler Master Cooling X PC
- Performs up to 20% better in Dead Space than Megaport - 139 vs 116 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 47% cheaper than Cooler Master Cooling X - €2119.0 vs €3999.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Dead Space than Cooler Master Cooling X - €18.27 vs €28.77 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€28.77/FPS
63.503649635036496%
Price, €
€3999
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74508 minutes ago
24th Variation
FPS
116
83.45323741007195%
Value, €/FPS
€18.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74509 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
24th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
70.56307911617961%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
72.80367695338148%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
24th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Cooler Master Cooling X PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
